Veterans Law / CAVC Attorney Needed to Review Draft Appeal Brief
I am seeking an attorney familiar with veterans law, Board of Veterans’ Appeals reconsideration practice, and appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.
The immediate task is to review a draft CAVC appellant brief in Docket No. 26-2452. The appeal concerns the Board’s March 6, 2026 denial of reconsideration under 38 C.F.R. § 20.1001.
The core issue is narrow: whether the Board erred by treating a legal-error motion as “mere disagreement” without explaining why the motion’s stated legal objection did not constitute obvious error of fact or law under § 20.1001.
I am not seeking a broad rewrite or a new theory. I need a focused legal review for:
CAVC procedural posture;
preservation of the issue;
adequacy of reasons-or-bases argument;
whether the draft properly distinguishes review of the March 6, 2026 reconsideration denial from direct review of the January 18, 2023 Board decision;
whether the draft avoids being mischaracterized as seeking review of the Secretary’s discretionary equitable-relief decision under 38 U.S.C. § 503;
any needed edits to strengthen the brief before filing.
Experience with CAVC briefing is strongly preferred. Experience with Board reconsideration under 38 C.F.R. § 20.1001, reasons-or-bases errors, Chenery/post-hoc-rationale issues, and veterans-law jurisdiction issues would be especially helpful.
Possible scope:
Review draft appellant brief and key record documents.
Provide written comments and recommended edits.
Optional: revise the brief.
Optional: limited or full representation before the CAVC if mutually agreed.
Please respond with:
your veterans-law/CAVC experience;
whether you have handled CAVC briefs or Board reconsideration issues;
your proposed fee for reviewing the draft;
your availability and turnaround time;
whether you are open to possible representation in the CAVC appeal.
This is a focused appellate/legal-error review, not a request for general VA claims assistance.
Apply tot his job
Apply To this Job
The immediate task is to review a draft CAVC appellant brief in Docket No. 26-2452. The appeal concerns the Board’s March 6, 2026 denial of reconsideration under 38 C.F.R. § 20.1001.
The core issue is narrow: whether the Board erred by treating a legal-error motion as “mere disagreement” without explaining why the motion’s stated legal objection did not constitute obvious error of fact or law under § 20.1001.
I am not seeking a broad rewrite or a new theory. I need a focused legal review for:
CAVC procedural posture;
preservation of the issue;
adequacy of reasons-or-bases argument;
whether the draft properly distinguishes review of the March 6, 2026 reconsideration denial from direct review of the January 18, 2023 Board decision;
whether the draft avoids being mischaracterized as seeking review of the Secretary’s discretionary equitable-relief decision under 38 U.S.C. § 503;
any needed edits to strengthen the brief before filing.
Experience with CAVC briefing is strongly preferred. Experience with Board reconsideration under 38 C.F.R. § 20.1001, reasons-or-bases errors, Chenery/post-hoc-rationale issues, and veterans-law jurisdiction issues would be especially helpful.
Possible scope:
Review draft appellant brief and key record documents.
Provide written comments and recommended edits.
Optional: revise the brief.
Optional: limited or full representation before the CAVC if mutually agreed.
Please respond with:
your veterans-law/CAVC experience;
whether you have handled CAVC briefs or Board reconsideration issues;
your proposed fee for reviewing the draft;
your availability and turnaround time;
whether you are open to possible representation in the CAVC appeal.
This is a focused appellate/legal-error review, not a request for general VA claims assistance.
Apply tot his job
Apply To this Job